What’s Holding Employers Back from Adopting DPC?

As we slide into Labor Day weekend, let’s talk about what is really holding employers back from adopting DPC into their health plans. Is it money? Fear of the unknown? Or lack of knowledge of how a health plan would work with DPC? Let’s drill down into it so DPC docs and benefits advisors can open up some eyes.

AI Summary:

On the surface, employers often say the barrier is cost—they assume adding DPC means paying for their existing insurance plus a new DPC membership, which looks like extra spend (e.g., hundreds of thousands of dollars). Purcell argues that is usually not the real issue.

The deeper problems are:

  • Lack of understanding of how a health plan can be rebuilt around DPC (typically as a self-funded plan with DPC as the foundation).
  • Brokers/benefits advisors who default to renewing traditional “industrialized” plans (like Blue Cross) instead of explaining alternatives such as self-funding, transparent PBMs, and TPAs.
  • Fear of change: gutting and rebuilding the plan, employee confusion, and extra work.

He uses an example of a large county employer whose costs were rising. After a 45-minute explanation of DPC (keeping most care in-house, fewer ER/urgent-care visits, discounted labs and meds), their first reaction was “this will just cost more.” The real conversation then became changing the entire plan, not stacking DPC on top of the old one. Education over time reduced fear and showed potential long-term savings, even if the transition is painful at first.Takeaway for DPC docs and advisors: Surface objections about money often hide missing knowledge. Guide employers toward better-informed brokers and a redesigned, DPC-centered plan rather than treating DPC as an add-on. It takes courage and work, but the long-term benefits can be substantial.