Should Employers Pay 100% of DPC Membership?

I want to tackle whether employers should pay the full DPC membership fee or only part of it. There are advantages and disadvantages for sure, but usually paying the full membership works best, allowing employees ot voluntarily select DPC or not. Let’s talk about it.

AI Summary:

  • Advantages of employers paying 100%:
    • Higher employee participation and use of the DPC service (fewer cost barriers).
    • Stronger recruiting and retention tool—positions it as a genuine, high-value benefit.
    • Greater likelihood employees will actually use primary care (no copays, deductibles, or out-of-pocket costs).
    • Simpler administration and billing (one invoice/payment instead of splitting costs or payroll deductions).
    • Potential tax advantages for both employer and employee (consult a CPA).
  • Disadvantages / concerns:
    • “Skin in the game” issue—some employees may undervalue or underuse a fully paid benefit.
    • Full financial commitment by the employer (e.g., $75/month × 100 employees = $7,500/month).
    • Some employees already have a primary care doctor they like and don’t want to switch.
    • Need a clear plan for what happens when employees leave, are terminated, or retire (can they continue the membership on their own?).
  • Recommended best approach (based on the speaker’s experience):
    • Employer pays 100% of the membership.
    • Enrollment is voluntary (don’t force employees to switch doctors).
    • Employees pay for spouses, kids, labs, meds, etc. (via payroll deduction or other arrangement).
    • Some self-funded larger employers may also choose to cover labs/meds because DPC pricing is often much cheaper than traditional options.
  • Bottom line: Paying 100% with voluntary enrollment generally works best for participation, retention, and simplicity while avoiding most of the drawbacks.