Fighting for that $16.04

You just have to love government healthcare. In 2021, Medicare tried to boost the pay for primary care doctors a little bit by trying to reward cognitive care. You know, spending more time with a patient and going over their issues as opposed to just doing procedures for big bucks.

The G2211 code was first introduced in 2021 as part of Medicare’s Physician Fee Schedule for physicians, its text indicating that it was meant to boost compensation for providers “serving as the continuing focal point for all of the patient’s healthcare services needs” or providing “ongoing medical care related to a patient’s single, serious…or complex condition (eg, sickle cell disease).”

All this for an extra $16.04.

How did it work out?

The analysis of Medicare claims data found that in 2024, its first year of use, the G22111 code was billed 26 million times for 10.6 million patients, generating about $394 million in payments.

But specialists billed more G22111 codes than primary care physicians, the study found.

I don’t know why this makes me laugh. Maybe because even when the system wants to some how reward primary care doctors, others jump right in for their piece of the pie.

First author Ishani Ganguli, MD, MPH, a primary care physician at Mass General Brigham and health services researcher at Harvard Medical School, Boston, said she was disappointed but not surprised that specialists most frequently used a code that was developed to help primary care.

“It was really meant to try to provide an additional payment for doctors providing longitudinal care and holistic care,” Ganguli said.

Speaking of “hole” istic care, I had a colonoscopy not long ago. I wrote about this in my newsletter at that time:

The nurse checking me in asked me the same medical questions I had answered multiple times in the process of getting this procedure scheduled. Her last question was different, however.

“Do I feel safe at home?”

I responded, “That is weird to ask me while I have prepped for 12 hours, I’m naked, and sleep deprived. Is that a quality metric they make you ask patients?”

The nurse, instead of explaining anything, just got mad at me and said they screen people all the time. I told her that sounds like it should be done at their family doctor’s office, and she scolded me, saying that patients aren’t always alone in those visits. I really didn’t want to argue this point. I was pretty vulnerable with my junk all out on the gurney. I just said “ok” and “no,” and I was safe. She played it off with a fake niceness as she put my IV in, etc., but then as she left, I saw her half-smile turn into a scowl. I could tell she hated me. Then it hit me. It’s obvious she has had some trauma in her life, and this issue was really important to her. It was still weird, but at least we did find one person positive with this screen – the nurse asking the question. I was so puzzled by all this. Why would this question be asked right before they wheel your naked ass into the colonoscopy suite? I don’t want to make light of the question about abuse, but I guarantee it was some third-party imposed metric. For the nurse, however, I wish her the best, and I hope she gets some peace in her life. I don’t know if she forgave me or not, but I did notice that when I got back to the room after the procedure, there was a different nurse.

So, were all those medical questions part of the longitudinal care needed to bill the G22111 code? Was the “Are you safe?” question really about me or the $16.04?

I don’t know the answer to all this, but the fact that the specialists were able to game the system so quickly for the few crumbs aimed at primary care tells me once again that Direct Primary Care is the answer to all this.

Can we just stop trying to fight for scraps at the government trough and start being our own boss?

10